INTERESTING READING PDF Print E-mail

How Many Motorcycles Have YOU Seen Today?


. . . . LOOK AGAIN !


More motorcycles are on the road today than ever before. The predominate cause of crashes is the failure of motorists to detect and recognize motorcycles in traffic. To avoid crashes and reduce injuries and fatalities, motorists should pay special attention to people riding motorcycles. This special attention starts with an awareness of motorcycles, an understanding of what to expect from motorcycles, and knowledge of where most crashes are likely to occur.

Facts About Motorcycles:
Awareness

  • The diversity of the motorcycling community is reflective of the general population. The rider you see on theroad may be a teacher, welder, secretary, doctor, etc. Motorcyclists are often your relatives, friends, and neighbors.
  • In Texas during 1993, the number of licensed motorcyclists was nearly 685,000. In the same year, there were 157 motorcycle fatalities and 3,937 injuries in 4,026 reported crashes.
  • When motorcycle related crashes occur, 75 percent of them involved a collision with another vehicle, usually a passenger car.
  • More than 50% of all crashes involving a motorcycle and a passenger car occurred because the motorist did not see the motorcycle (or did not see it soon enough to respond.)

What Motorists Can Do:
Put On Your CYCLEVISION

To decrease the number of motorcycle crashes, it is imperative that motorists increase their awareness, understanding, and respect of motorcyclists. There is no magical formula; however, motorists can take an active role to ensure their safety and the safety of riders.

The first step is to ask yourself: “How many motorcycles did I see today?” Then, look again, to assure that you have looked for motorcycles and automobiles. This is what we call putting on your CYCLEVISION. Putting on your CYCLEVISION is a mental attitude and an awareness that motorcycles are everywhere.

The Challenge Of Motorcycling:
Another Point Of View

Here are a few important facts to help motorists understand the challenges of motorcycling:

Size & Visibility

Motorists are familiar with looking for other cars, not motorcycles. Motorcycles are smaller than cars and trucks, therefore, they are harder to see. It is also difficult to judge a motorcycle's speed and distance accurately.

Maneuvering & Obstacles

A motorcycle occupies 4 feet of a 12 foot lane in traffic. The motorcyclist moves within the lane, adjusting to changing driving conditions - the road, the weather, or other vehicles.  While motorcyclists typically ride in the left portion of a lane, they may move suddenly to get out of a motorist's blind spot. Remember, motorcycles use as much of the lane as cars do - just not all at one time.

Vulnerability

Motorcycles do not have protective exteriors like cars and, therefore, are more vulnerable to a variety of elements.

Even with the proper clothing and helmets, motorcyclists are at a higher risk of injury, should they be involved in a crash.

Motorcyclists are more affected by bad weather such as rain, high winds, and ice.

Understanding the challenges faced by motorcyclists can help motorists see another point of view while driving.  Drivers can then anticipate the rider's moves and perhaps help prevent a crash from occurring. This is an essential part of driving with your CYCLEVISION turned on. Knowing where automobile and motorcycle crashes frequently occur is the next element of CYCLEVISION.

Typical Problem Spots:
Look, and then Look Again !

1. Intersections
The most frequent cause of multi-vehicle crashes is a motorist turning left in front of an oncoming motorcycle. Anywhere two vehicles' paths can cross creates a danger point for both motorcycles and automobiles. This includes driveways, parking lots, and side street entrances. When vehicles slow, stop, or turn, the possibility for a collision is greatly increased.

2. Two lanes of traffic traveling in the same direction
Motorcycles may be difficult to see and are susceptible to crashes when they are changing lanes, passing cars, or being passed. Crashes often occur when motorists follow motorcycles too closely or try to share their lane.

3. External Conditions
Weather and road conditions make driving difficult for everyone, but the motorcyclist feels the external factors to a much greater degree.

Drive Responsibly:
Take An Active Role

Every driving situation is different and must be dealt with accordingly. Motorists that put on their CYCLEVISION look for, understand, and respect motorcycles sharing the roadway. Applying these suggestions is the responsibility of the motorist.

1. Actively look for motorcycles anytime you are on the road. Expect to see motorcycles, not just another car. Do not trust your mirrors because motorcycles can be hidden in your blind spot. Instead, turn and look over your shoulder. Drivers should look twice at intersections before proceeding. Being alert and paying specialattention to motorcycles is essential to driving responsibly.

2. Keep in mind the motorcyclist's point of view. Remember, motorcyclists move around on the road. Anticipate their movements, particularly in the places where crashes are most likely to occur.

3. Give the motorcycle the same space and respect that you would give other vehicles. Do not forget that they use the whole lane of traffic, even though it is not all at one time. Always give them a full lane and remember not to follow too closely. Allow a two to three second safety cushion between you and the motorcycle and increase it to four to five seconds when road or weather conditions are bad.

4. Be courteous. Let the motorcyclist know well in advance when you are planning to stop, turn, or change lanes. Do not speed up when a motorcycle is passing you. Never cut in too closely after passing a motorcycle. Remember that the person underneath that helmet could be someone you know.

CYCLEVISION is a mental attitude that motorists apply to help decrease the number of motorcycle crashes each year. Drivers that put on their CYCLEVISION are consciously aware of motorcycles and recognize potential crash areas. Each time you drive your automobile, put on your CYCLEVISION and ask yourself:

“How many motorcycles did I see today?” Then,
Look Again !

Email: Motorcycle Safety Unit


You can contact the Motorcycle Safety Unit at:

Motorcycle Safety Unit
Texas Department of Public Safety
P O Box 4087
Austin, Texas  78773-0001
Phone: (512) 424-2021
or 1-800-292-5787

About DPS | General DPS Information | DPS Online Services | DPS News | DPS Employment | DPS Website Site Index | DPS Contact Information
Visit these related sites.

Texas Department of Public Safety 5805 North Lamar Blvd. Austin, Texas 78752-4422 
P O Box 4087 Austin, Texas 78773-0001
(512) 424-2000
© 2000Texas Department of Public Safety.

If an employee or division provided outstanding service or if you have suggestions for improvement, please let us know. Take our Customer Survey.

Pursuant to Section 552.301(c), Government Code, the Public Information Office has been designated to receive all electronic mail requests for public information. The Department is not responsible for responding to electronic mail requests sent to any electronic mail address other than the address for the public information office.

How does the sounds of the road effect your hearing...I SAID EFFECT YOUR HEARING! Check out the article below to find out.

Custom Fit Hearing Protection and More for Motorcyclists

This brochure is a copy of an American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Public Service Brochure.

One in 10 Americans has a hearing loss that affects his ability to understand normal speech. Excessive noise exposure is the most common cause of hearing loss.

Can Noise Really Hurt My Ears?

Yes - noise can be dangerous. If it is loud enough and lasts long enough, it can damage your hearing. The damage caused by noise, called sensorineural hearing loss or nerve loss, can be caused by several factors other than noise, but noise-induced hearing loss is different in one important way - it can be reduced or prevented altogether.

Can I "Toughen Up" My Ears?

No, If you think you have grown used to a loud noise, it probably has damaged your ears, and there is no treatment - no medicine, no surgery, not even a hearing aid that truly corrects your hearing once it is damaged by noise.

How Does the Ear Work?

The ear has three main parts: the outer, middle, and inner ear. The outer ear (the part you can see) opens into the ear canal. The eardrum separates the ear canal from the middle ear, Small bones in the middle ear help transfer sound to the inner ear. The inner ear contains the auditory (hearing) nerve, which leads to the brain.

Any source of sound sends vibrations or sound waves into the air. These funnel through the ear opening, down the ear canal, and strike your eardrum, causing it to vibrate. The vibrations are passed to the small bones of the middle ear, which transmit them to the hearing nerve in the inner ear. There, the vibrations become nerve impulses and go directly to the brain, which interprets the impulses as sound: music, a slamming door, a voice, etc.

When noise is too loud, it begins to kill the nerve's endings in the inner car. As the exposure time to loud noise increases, more and more nerve endings are destroyed, As the number of nerve endings decreases, so does your hearing. There is no way to restore life to dead nerve endings; the damage is permanent.

How Can I Tell If a Noise Is Dangerous?

People differ in their sensitivity to noise. As a general rule, noise may damage your hearing if you have to shout over background noise to make yourself heard, the noise hurts your ears, it makes your ears ring, or you are slightly deaf for several hours after exposure to the noise.

Sound can be measured scientifically in two ways. Intensity, or loudness of sound, is measured in decibels. Pitch is measured in frequency of sound vibrations per second. A low pitch such as a deep voice or a tuba makes fewer vibrations per second than a high voice or violin.

What Does Frequency Have to Do with Hearing Loss?

Frequency is measured in cycles per second, or Hertz (Hz). The higher the pitch of the sound, the higher the frequency, Young children, who generally have the best hearing, can often distinguish sounds from about 20 Hz, such as the lowest note on a large pipe organ, to 20,000 Hz, such as the high shrill of a dog whistle that many people are unable to hear.

Human speech, which ranges from 300 to 4,000 Hz, sounds louder to most people than noises at very high or very low frequencies. When hearing impairment begin, the high frequencies are often lost first, which is why people with hearing loss often have difficulty hearing the high pitched voices of women and children.

Loss of high frequency hearing also can distort sound, so that speech is difficult to understand even though it can be heard. Hearing impaired people often have difficulty detecting differences between certain words that sound alike, especially words that contain S, F, SH, CH, H, or soft C, sounds, because the sound of these consonant is in a much higher frequency range than vowels and other consonants.

What About Decibels?

Intensity of sound is measured in decibels (dB). The scale runs from the faintest sound the human ear can detect., which is labeled 0 dB, to over 180 dB, the noise at a rocket pad during launch. Decibels are measured logarithmically. This means that as decibel intensity increases by units of 10, each increase is 10 times the lower figure. Thus, 20 decibel is 10 times the intensity of 10 decibels, and 50 decibels is 10,000 times as intense as 10 decibels.

Approximate Decibel Level

0

the quietest sound you can hear 30 whisper, quiet library
60 normal conversation, sewing machine, typewriter
90 lawnmower, shop tools, truck traffic, 8 hours per day is the maximum exposure (protects 90% of people)
100 chainsaw, pneumatic drill, snowmobile; 2 hours per day is the maximum exposure without protection
115 sandblasting, loud rock concert, auto horn; 15 minutes per day is the maximum exposure without protection
140 gun muzzle blast, jet engine; Boise causes pain and even brief exposure injures unprotected ears. Maximum allowed noise with hearing protector

How High Can the Decibels Go Without Affecting My Hearing?

Many experts agree that continual exposure to more than 85 decibels may become dangerous.

Does the Length of Time I Hear a Noise Have Anything to with the Danger to My Hearing?

It certainly does. The longer you are exposed to a loud noise, the more damaging it may be. Also, the closer you are to the source of intense noise, the more damaging it is.

Every gunshot produces a noise that could damage the ears of anyone in close hearing range. Large bore guns and artillery are the worst because they are the loudest. But even cap guns and firecrackers can damage your hearing if the explosion is close to your ear. Anyone who uses firearms without some form of ear protection risks hearing loss.

Recent studies show an alarming increase in hearing loss in youngsters. Evidence suggests that loud rock music along with increased use of portable radios with earphones may be responsible for this phenomenon.

Can Noise Affect More Than My Hearing?

A ringing in the ears, called tinnitus, commonly occurs after noise exposure, and it often becomes permanent. Some people react to loud noise with anxiety and irritability, an increase in pulse rate and blood processor, or an increase in stomach acid. Very loud noise can reduce efficiency in performing difficult tasks by diverting attention from the job.

Who Should Wear Hearing Protectors?

If you must work in an excessively noisy environment, you should wear protectors. You should also wear them when you are using power tools, noisy yard equipment, or firearms.

What Are the Laws for On-the-Job Exposure?

Habitual exposure to noise above 85 dB will cause a gradual hearing loss in a significant number of individuals, and louder noises will accelerate this damage. For unprotected ears, the allowed exposure time decreases by ONE HALF FOR EACH 5 dB INCREASE in the average noise level. For instance, exposure is limited to 8 hr at 90 dB, 4 hr at 95 dB, and 2 hr at 100 dB. The highest permissible noise exposure for the UNPROTECTED ear is 115 dB for 15 MINUTES/day. Any noise above 140 dB IS NOT PERMITTED.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, in its Hearing Conservation Amendment of 1983, requires hearing conservation programs in noisy work places. This includes a yearly hearing test for the approximately five million workers exposed to an average of 85 d5 or snore of noise during an 8-hour work day.

Ideally, noisy machinery and work places should be engineered to be more quiet or the worker's time in the noise should be reduced; however, the cost of these actions is often prohibitive. As an alternative, individual hearing protectors are required when noise averages more than 90 dB during an 8-hour day.

When noise measurements indicate that hearing protectors are needed, the employer must offer at least one type of earplug and one type of earmuff without cost to employees. If the yearly hearing tests reveal hearing loss of l0 dB or more in higher pitches in either ear, the worker must be informed and must wear hearing protectors when noise averages more than 85 dB for an 8-hour day.

Larger losses of hearing and/or the possibility of ear disease should result in referral to an ear, nose and throat physician (otolaryngologist).

What Are Hearing Protectors? How Effective Are They?

Hearing protection devices decrease the intensity of sound that reaches the eardrum. They come in two forms: earplugs and earmuffs.

Earplugs are small inserts that fit into the outer ear canal, To be effective they must totally block the ear canal with an airtight seal. they are available in a variety of shapes and sizes to fit individual ear canals and can be custom made. For people who have trouble keeping them in their ear, they can be fitted to a headband.

Earmuffs fit over the entire outer ear to form an air seal so the entire circumference of the ear canal is blocked, and they are held in place by an adjustable band. Earmuffs will not seal around eyeglasses or long hair, and the adjustable headband tension must he sufficient to hold earmuffs firmly around the ear. Earplugs must be snugly sealed so the entire circumference of the ear canal is blocked. An improperly fitted, dirty or worn-out plug may not seal and can irritate the ear canal.

Properly fitted earplugs or muffs reduce noise 15 to 30 dB. The better earplugs and muffs are approximately equal in sound reduction, although earplugs are better for low frequency noise and earmuffs for high frequency noise. Simultaneous use of earplugs and muffs usually adds 10 to 15 dB more protection than either used alone. Combined use should be considered when noise exceeds 105 dB.

Why Can't I Just Stuff My Ears with Cotton?

Ordinary cotton halls or tissue paper wads stuffed into the ear canals are very poor protectors; they reduce noise only by approximately 7 dB.

What Are the Common Problems of Hearing Protectors?

Studies have shown that one-half of the workers wearing hearing protectors receive one-half or less of the noise reduction potential of their protectors because these devices are not worn continuously while in noise or because they do not fit properly.

A hearing protector that gives an average of 30 dB of noise reduction, if worn continuously during an 8-hour work day, becomes equivalent to only 9 dB of protection if taken off for one hour in the noise. This is because decibels are measured on a logarithmic scale, and there is a 10-fold increase in noise energy for each 10 dB increase.

During the hour with unprotected ears, the worker is exposed to 1,000 times more sound energy than if earplugs or muffs had been worn. In addition, noise exposure is cumulative. So the noise at home or at play must be counted in the total exposure during any one day. A maximum allowable while on-the-job followed by exposure to a noisy lawnmower or loud music will definitely exceed the safe daily limit.

Even if earplugs and/or muffs are worn continuously while in noise, they do little good if there is an incomplete air seal between the hearing protector and the skin. When using hearing protectors, you will hear your own voice as louder and deeper. This is a useful sign that the hearing protectors are properly positioned.

Can I Hear Other People and Machine Problems If I WearHearing Protectors?

Just as sunglasses help vision in very bright light, so do hearing protectors enhance speech understanding in very noisy places. Even in a quiet setting, a normal hearing person wearing hearing protectors should he able to understand a regular conversation. Hearing protectors do slightly reduce the ability of those with damaged hearing or poor comprehension of language to understand normal conversation, However, it is essential that persons with impaired hearing wear earplugs or muffs to prevent further inner ear damage. It has been argued that hearing protectors might reduce a worker's ability to hear the noises that signify an improperly functioning machine. However, most workers readily adjust to the quieter sounds and can still detect such problems.

What If My Hearing Is Already Damaged? How Can I Tell?

Hearing loss usually develops over a period of several years. Since it is painless and gradual, you might not notice it. What you might notice is a ringing or other sound in your ear (called tinnitus), which could he the result of long-term exposure to noise that has damaged the hearing nerve. Or, you may have trouble understanding what people say; they may seem to be mumbling, especially when you are in a noisy place such as in a crowd or at a party. This could be the beginning of high-frequency hearing loss; a hearing test will detect it. If you have any of these symptoms, you may have nothing more serious than impacted wax or an ear infection, which might be simply corrected, However, it might be hearing loss from noise. In any case, take no chances with noise - the hearing loss it causes is permanent. If you suspect a hearing loss, consult a physician with special training in ear care and hearing disorders (called an otolaryngologist or otologist). This doctor can diagnose your hearing problem and recommend the best way to manage it.

©1995. This leaflet is published as a public service; material may be freely used for noncommercial purposes so long as attribution is given to the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Inc.,One Prince Street, Alexandria VA 22314-3357

BIKERNET.COM INDEPENDENT MOTORCYCLE NOISE STUDY

In a world of increased levels of constant noise and heightened 
efforts to curb excessive decibel levels motorcycles take a hit. 
Bikernet.com, the world's largest website in the custom motorcycle 
industry, sought to study motorcycle noise against constant 
environmental disturbances and put the motorcycle exhaust sound into 
proper perspective.

Motorcycles are unique in that they are the least pervasive of all 
vehicles jammed onto our roads today. They have the least protection 
and the best mpg ratings of all vehicles. We noted the obvious, 
motorcycles lack bumpers, airbags, double-wall doors or steel 
ceilings, yet take up 1/3 of the space of common sedans, and are more 
agile than trucks or compacts in avoiding dangerous situations. 
Motorcycles have but two defensive measures to enhance their agility; 
visual and auditory awareness. For decades motorists have used the 
excuse that they are unable to see a narrow motorcycle, so it's okay 
to hit one. State legislators are currently dealing with that fallacy.

Yet, still between 70 and 85 percent of all motorcycle/motor vehicle 
accidents are caused by motorists. Plus, the use of cell phones, GPS 
screens, DVDs, CD players and other major distractions are increasing 
the need for motorcycle awareness.

Recent statistics indicate that over 80 percent of motor vehicle 
accidents happened while the driver is distracted by cell phones, 
eating or other interruptions.

Much like emergency vehicles, the sound a motorcycle makes is critical 
to its ability to alert motorists of its whereabouts. That became our 
study criteria and we tested four motorcycles to determine an 
acceptable decibel level to allow a motorcyclist to be heard. We also 
discovered a recent court case that demonstrated this contention. Å 
woman testified she was unaware of the presence of a motorcycle. Sound 
testing proved her a liar. We measured the decibel levels from 2 feet 
away from the open end of the muffler at 45 degrees. We also 
discovered that some states measure decibel levels from as far as 50 
feet away. In that case every motorcycle tested emitted less noise 
than most 18-wheelers.

2003 Harley-Davidson Road King Classic, 1,400cc with mild 
modifications and a full Screamin' Eagle 2-into-1 Exhaust System:
100 decibels at idle
108 decibels at cruising throttle
116 decibels fully revved.

2004 1200 cc Sportster with full aftermarket Samson 2-into-1 Exhaust system:
100 decibles at idle
108 decibels at moderate rpms
120 decibels fully revved.

Custom 1956 Harley-Davidson, 1488 cc, with custom 2-into-2 exhaust 
system with modified shorty mufflers:
102 decibels at idle
111 decibels at cruising speeds
124 decibels revved

2006 Softail Standard 1,400 cc, original from the factory:
97 decibels at idle
102 decibels at cruising speed
111 decibels revved

For reference, we measured the noise levels of cars and trucks passing 
our meter at between 35-45 mph at 10-50 feet distance. Passenger 
vehicles ranged in the 78-83 decibel range whereas trucks ranged from 
90-100 at that distance.

We took each one of these motorcycles and tested them in three traffic 
scenarios.

Passing: Wherein a motorcycle approached a passenger vehicle with 
windows rolled up and radio playing (and without). We tested the 
approach from both sides of the car.

Oncoming Intersection Scenario: Again we used a late model passenger 
vehicle with the windows rolled up a radio playing (and without). This 
time both vehicles approached an intersection and we determined if the 
motorcycle could be heard across an intersection in this test vehicle.

Cross Traffic: Again we tested whether a motorcycle can be heard 
closing on an intersection from a right angle from the oncoming 
vehicle approaching an intersection, when a building exists on the 
right hand corner.

We discovered that the stock motorcycle could not be heard in the 
passing test unless the motorcycle was along side a moving vehicle. If 
a radio was playing at 80 decibels within the vehicle the motorcycle 
would be nearly undetectable. A dangerous situation for a motorcycle 
that takes up limited mirror viewing area.

We discovered that with a radio playing the Sportster could be heard 
at just one car length behind the vehicle. The results were almost the 
same for the Road King.

With the radio off, these motorcycles could be discerned at two car 
lengths. A brief span of time in traffic to maneuver if a car altered 
its direction abruptly.

The custom bike could be easily detected following at 5 car lengths 
and close to 7 if the radio was not in the equation.

The intersection test was the most difficult because speed and 
distance are tricky to determine control. The un-altered 
Harley-Davidson was difficult to hear at all with or without radio 
interference.

The modified Road King and Sportsters had a fleeting chance of being 
heard across an intersection to warn a motorist. The only motorcycle 
that could be easily heard across an intersection was the 1956 Custom 
with modified exhaust.

The final test was most interesting. Again the stock bike would 
virtually arrive at the intersection unheard, whereas the Sportster 
and the Road King were detected for 3 car lengths before the 
intersection. Consequently there would be a moment of driver reaction 
time available, at 35 mph, for the driver or motorcyclist to react to 
a dangerous situation.

Again the custom bike with modified exhaust could be heard from over a 
block away prior to the intersection allowing the driver to be aware 
of an approaching motorcycle and make defensive maneuvers prior to 
entering the intersection.

Our study also identified the consistency of road sound in an 
industrial area in Wilmington, California, which affords almost year 
around riding weather. This street has an average of 450 trucks 
passing in an hour given at 93-100 decibels. An average of 673 cars 
pass daily during a peak hour at a constant 81-83 decibels and maybe a 
dozen motorcycles pass by during that hour for a culminated seconds of 
motorcycle noise at 80-100 decibels.

Our findings point out various considerations regarding motorcycle 
noise regulations. We are not in favor of disturbing or irresponsible 
motorcycle noise. We support Daytona, Florida's anti-revving 
ordinance. Abusive noise use is ticketed. We also support an ordinance 
that allows ticketing for any motorcyclist who abuses his motorcycle 
after 10:00 p.m. at night in a residential district. We believe that 
motorcycles need to make some noise, but that it must be handled 
responsibly.


Cycle_News mailing list
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

=======================================================================


"The Hurt Report"
(AKA "Motorcycle Accident Cause Factors and Identification of Countermeasures")

A brief summary of the findings is listed below. To order the full report, contact:

    National Technical Information Service
    5285 Port Royal Road
    Springfield, Virginia 22161
    (703)-487-4600

and order:

    Motorcycle Accident Cause Factors and Identification of Countermeasures, Volume 1: Technical Report, Hurt, H.H., Ouellet, J.V. and Thom, D.R., Traffic Safety Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90007, Contract No. DOT HS-5-01160, January 1981 (Final Report)
    Vol.I (The Main Report and Summary) is PB81206443 (~400 pages)
    Vol.II (Appendix: Supplementary Data) is PB81206450 (~400 pages)
    Either document is $42.95 plus $3.00 shipping. (circa 1990)


Summary of Findings


Throughout the accident and exposure data there are special observations which relate to accident and injury causation and characteristics of the motorcycle accidents studied. These findings are summarized as follows:

1. Approximately three-fourths of these motorcycle accidents involved collision with another vehicle, which was most often a passenger automobile.

2. Approximately one-fourth of these motorcycle accidents were single vehicle accidents involving the motorcycle colliding with the roadway or some fixed object in the environment.

3. Vehicle failure accounted for less than 3% of these motorcycle accidents, and most of those were single vehicle accidents where control was lost due to a puncture flat.

4. In single vehicle accidents, motorcycle rider error was present as the accident precipitating factor in about two-thirds of the cases, with the typical error being a slideout and fall due to overbraking or running wide on a curve due to excess speed or under-cornering.

5. Roadway defects (pavement ridges, potholes, etc.) were the accident cause in 2% of the accidents; animal involvement was 1% of the accidents.

6. In multiple vehicle accidents, the driver of the other vehicle violated the motorcycle right-of-way and caused the accident in two-thirds of those accidents.

7. The failure of motorists to detect and recognize motorcycles in traffic is the predominating cause of motorcycle accidents. The driver of the other vehicle involved in collision with the motorcycle did not see the motorcycle before the collision, or did not see the motorcycle until too late to avoid the collision.

8. Deliberate hostile action by a motorist against a motorcycle rider is a rare accident cause. The most frequent accident configuration is the motorcycle proceeding straight then the automobile makes a left turn in front of the oncoming motorcycle.

10. Intersections are the most likely place for the motorcycle accident, with the other vehicle violating the motorcycle right-of-way, and often violating traffic controls.

11. Weather is not a factor in 98% of motorcycle accidents.

12. Most motorcycle accidents involve a short trip associated with shopping, errands, friends, entertainment or recreation, and the accident is likely to happen in a very short time close to the trip origin.

13. The view of the motorcycle or the other vehicle involved in the accident is limited by glare or obstructed by other vehicles in almost half of the multiple vehicle accidents.

14. Conspicuity of the motorcycle is a critical factor in the multiple vehicle accidents, and accident involvement is significantly reduced by the use of motorcycle headlamps (on in daylight) and the wearing of high visibility yellow, orange or bright red jackets.

15. Fuel system leaks and spills were present in 62% of the motorcycle accidents in the post-crash phase. This represents an undue hazard for fire.

16. The median pre-crash speed was 29.8 mph, and the median crash speed was 21.5 mph, and the one-in-a-thousand crash speed is approximately 86 mph.

17. The typical motorcycle pre-crash lines-of-sight to the traffic hazard portray no contribution of the limits of peripheral vision; more than three-fourths of all accident hazards are within 45deg of either side of straight ahead.

18. Conspicuity of the motorcycle is most critical for the frontal surfaces of the motorcycle and rider.

19. Vehicle defects related to accident causation are rare and likely to be due to deficient or defective maintenance.

20. Motorcycle riders between the ages of 16 and 24 are significantly overrepresented in accidents; motorcycle riders between the ages of 30 and 50 are significantly underrepresented. Although the majority of the accident-involved motorcycle riders are male (96%), the female motorcycles riders are significantly overrepresented in the accident data.

22. Craftsmen, laborers, and students comprise most of the accident-involved motorcycle riders. Professionals, sales workers, and craftsmen are underrepresented and laborers, students and unemployed are overrepresented in the accidents.

23. Motorcycle riders with previous recent traffic citations and accidents are overrepresented in the accident data.

24. The motorcycle riders involved in accidents are essentially without training; 92% were self-taught or learned from family or friends. Motorcycle rider training experience reduces accident involvement and is related to reduced injuries in the event of accidents.

25. More than half of the accident-involved motorcycle riders had less than 5 months experience on the accident motorcycle, although the total street riding experience was almost 3 years. Motorcycle riders with dirt bike experience are significantly underrepresented in the accident data.

26. Lack of attention to the driving task is a common factor for the motorcyclist in an accident.

27. Almost half of the fatal accidents show alcohol involvement.

28. Motorcycle riders in these accidents showed significant collision avoidance problems. Most riders would overbrake and skid the rear wheel, and underbrake the front wheel greatly reducing collision avoidance deceleration. The ability to countersteer and swerve was essentially absent.

29. The typical motorcycle accident allows the motorcyclist just less than 2 seconds to complete all collision avoidance action.

30. Passenger-carrying motorcycles are not overrepresented in the accident area.

31. The driver of the other vehicles involved in collision with the motorcycle are not distinguished from other accident populations except that the ages of 20 to 29, and beyond 65 are overrepresented. Also, these drivers are generally unfamiliar with motorcycles.

32. Large displacement motorcycles are underrepresented in accidents but they are associated with higher injury severity when involved in accidents.

33. Any effect of motorcycle color on accident involvement is not determinable from these data, but is expected to be insignificant because the frontal surfaces are most often presented to the other vehicle involved in the collision.

34. Motorcycles equipped with fairings and windshields are underrepresented in accidents, most likely because of the contribution to conspicuity and the association with more experienced and trained riders.

35. Motorcycle riders in these accidents were significantly without motorcycle license, without any license, or with license revoked.

36. Motorcycle modifications such as those associated with the semi-chopper or cafe racer are definitely overrepresented in accidents.

37. The likelihood of injury is extremely high in these motorcycle accidents-98% of the multiple vehicle collisions and 96% of the single vehicle accidents resulted in some kind of injury to the motorcycle rider; 45% resulted in more than a minor injury.

38. Half of the injuries to the somatic regions were to the ankle-foot, lower leg, knee, and thigh-upper leg.

39. Crash bars are not an effective injury countermeasure; the reduction of injury to the ankle-foot is balanced by increase of injury to the thigh-upper leg, knee, and lower leg.

40. The use of heavy boots, jacket, gloves, etc., is effective in preventing or reducing abrasions and lacerations, which are frequent but rarely severe injuries.

41. Groin injuries were sustained by the motorcyclist in at least 13% of the accidents, which typified by multiple vehicle collision in frontal impact at higher than average speed.

42. Injury severity increases with speed, alcohol involvement and motorcycle size.

43. Seventy-three percent of the accident-involved motorcycle riders used no eye protection, and it is likely that the wind on the unprotected eyes contributed in impairment of vision which delayed hazard detection.

44. Approximately 50% of the motorcycle riders in traffic were using safety helmets but only 40% of the accident-involved motorcycle riders were wearing helmets at the time of the accident.

45. Voluntary safety helmet use by those accident-involved motorcycle riders was lowest for untrained, uneducated, young motorcycle riders on hot days and short trips.

46. The most deadly injuries to the accident victims were injuries to the chest and head.

47. The use of the safety helmet is the single critical factor in the prevention of reduction of head injury; the safety helmet which complies with FMVSS 218 is a significantly effective injury countermeasure.

48. Safety helmet use caused no attenuation of critical traffic sounds, no limitation of precrash visual field, and no fatigue or loss of attention; no element of accident causation was related to helmet use.

49. FMVSS 218 provides a high level of protection in traffic accidents, and needs modification only to increase coverage at the back of the head and demonstrate impact protection of the front of full facial coverage helmets, and insure all adult sizes for traffic use are covered by the standard.

50. Helmeted riders and passengers showed significantly lower head and neck injury for all types of injury, at all levels of injury severity.

51. The increased coverage of the full facial coverage helmet increases protection, and significantly reduces face injuries.

52. There is no liability for neck injury by wearing a safety helmet; helmeted riders had less neck injuries than unhelmeted riders. Only four minor injuries were attributable to helmet use, and in each case the helmet prevented possible critical or fatal head injury.

53. Sixty percent of the motorcyclists were not wearing safety helmets at the time of the accident. Of this group, 26% said they did not wear helmets because they were uncomfortable and inconvenient, and 53% simply had no expectation of accident involvement.

54. Valid motorcycle exposure data can be obtained only from collection at the traffic site. Motor vehicle or driver license data presents information which is completely unrelated to actual use.

55. Less than 10% of the motorcycle riders involved in these accidents had insurance of any kind to provide medical care or replace property.
==========================================================

POLICE MOTORCYCLE TRAINING.

Downloads
Download a pdf version of this training article.
Riding in the Rain

By Sgt. Andy Norrie

"Even rode my motorcycle in the rain,
And you told me not to drive,
But, I made it home alive
So you said that only proves that I'm insane"

Excerpt from "You may be right" by Billy Joel

Insane may be the way most motorcycle riders would describe motorcyclists who ride in the rain on purpose. Unfortunately, whether we like it or not, as professional law enforcement motor officers, it is inevitable that we will find ourselves riding our duty motorcycles in the rain. Unlike our civilian counterparts, most of us cannot simply decide not to ride if it is raining or if the weather forecasters are reporting that rain is likely. Many aspects of our job, such as specialized enforcement or escort duty will require us to ride rain or shine.

As professional riders, we must prepare ourselves for all potential risks that could affect our ability to perform our duty. The first step in this preparation is to learn as much as we can about this and other areas affecting our job.

Equipment
It is imperative that you have good rain gear (and have it with you on your motor). There are many quality products offered by a variety of manufacturers to suit your needs. Rain and inclement weather produce low light conditions and other vehicles produce road spray all combining to limit your conspicuity (visibility) to other road users. That is why many departments have gone to a highly reflective, bright colored rain suits to combat this issue.

Waterproof boots and gloves are also a must. Throttle, clutch and brake controls on a motorcycle all require feeling and dexterity of your hands and feet. Once your hands and feet get wet, it will only be a short time before they get cold and you reduce or lose your ability to manipulate your motorcycle controls. Also, being wet and cold will distract you from your attention to riding, something you don't want to happen while you are riding in the rain. You want to maintain your mental edge.

You should have clear lenses for your glasses or a clear face shield (if your department is using that style of helmet) to permit clear vision. Be aware of fogging of your glasses or shield in rain conditions. Cracking your shield open a bit or moving your glasses further away from your eyes will permit air to flow on the inner side of the lenses and keep them clear.

At first sign of rain pull off the road and put on your rain gear. If the type of duty you are performing will not permit a pull off, then you are going to have to make a judgment call about putting on your rain gear ahead of time. The first 10 to 15 minutes of a rain storm are the most dangerous. The rain water mixes with the oil, dirt and road debris that has been sitting on the asphalt to create a greasy, slippery coating on the road. This usually washes away within this time limit. So if you can, pull off under a bridge or other dry spot and use this initial raining time to put on your rain gear and adjust your riding attitude and style to suit these new conditions. Again, if your duty does not permit a pull off then you should ride with heightened caution during this time.

Your motor is part of your equipment and you should always be checking your lights and tires prior to riding. The condition and traction ability of your tire's contact patch can make the difference between the weather being a minor inconvenience to taking a ride in the back of an ambulance. Check your tire pressure and your tread depth. Your tire pressure should be at the manufacturer's recommended rating and your tires should have enough tread to channel away water from under your motor's tires.

Traction
Research tells us that a motorcycle will have 75 to 80% of maximum traction in wet weather. If we have been applying effective riding strategies in our motorcycle riding style, nothing else should change when it rains. Good proactive riding habits of eye lead, scanning, anticipating and predicting, combined with effective application of your throttle, clutch and braking systems topped off with proper reactive skills of braking, turning and collision avoidance all still apply to riding in the rain. What wet riding does require is good smooth application of your systems. Wet riding seems to be a lot less forgiving then dry weather riding when it comes to errors of under or over application of inputs. Do your accelerating and braking in a straight line, set your corner speed in advance, smooth application of your clutch, throttle and brakes will keep the wheels of your motor from breaking free from the traction of your tire's contact patch. Keep your eyes up and identify hazards well ahead of time so you can make smooth adjustments. Remember to look where you want to go.

Hazards
Hydroplaning occurs when a tire cannot channel all the water out from under the tire and the tire rides up on top of a thin layer of water and removes all of your traction. You might get away with this on a four wheel vehicle but a crash is almost inevitable on a motorcycle. Many factors affect when a motorcycle will hydroplane; water depth, speed, weight, width of tire, tire tread depth and tread pattern. All tires will hydroplane when presented with the right combination of these factors. The experts say keeping your speed below 55mph (90km/h) will reduce most of this risk, but there are no guarantees. If you do hydroplane, do not steer, lean or apply any braking but maintain your direction and PRAY. Good eye lead and scanning the road surface for hazards including puddles can help avoid potential hydroplaning situations. Riding in the track of the vehicles ahead may also help avoid these situations as the tires of that vehicle will disperse the water on the road so your tire won't have to work as hard. Also, when the vehicle ahead hits a puddle the spray from the puddle will indicate a hazardous situation for you to avoid.

Along with the risk of hydroplaning in pooling or ponding water, you must also be aware of varying road surfaces reacting differently to rain. Steel plates, streetcar tracks, grated metal bridges, earth, painted road markings, wood bridges and railway tracks all change their co-efficient of friction (grip) to differing degrees when wet. Avoid riding on multiple surfaces if possible.

Rain + Night (a double whammy)
Every drop of rain lying on the road, in puddles, on your windshield, on your glasses or visor, refracts light given off by headlights, tail lights and street lights into your straining eyes. Add flashing emergency lights to this equation and you may overload your optical inputs. Remember to focus on the fog line (the outside white line on your lane of the roadway) to avoid being dazzled by oncoming lights. Try to use the weaker glare off the tail lights of the vehicle in front of you to identify puddles or hazards in your riding path. Remember you must keep your eyes moving, don't fixate on one spot.

Train/practice in the wet/rain
Training should be as real as possible. Either train on a rainy day or simulate wet road conditions by watering down your training pad. Practice all your life saving skills: Braking/collision avoidance/cornering and turning in wet conditions. You will have much more confidence in both yourself and your bike the next time you get caught in the rain.

Ultimately, the best application of a life saving motorcycle riding skill, is to employ a "system" for motorcycle riding that helps you identify and avoid hazards so you don't have to employ the life saving skill in the first place.

Andy Norrie is a Staff Sergeant with the Toronto Police Service in Toronto, Canada. He has been a member of the Department for the past 23 years and has over 21 years of experience on police motorcycle duty. Andy is an instructor for the North-Western University, Center for Public Safety/Harley Davidson Canada Police Motorcycle Program. He has attended and participated in various police motorcycle training and competition events since 1991 and is one of the founders of the
Great Lakes Police Motorcycle Training Seminar based in and around the province of Ontario, Canada since 1999. He can be reached at: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
 

Online Payment Service